|Summary:||ruby should own /usr/include/vendor_ruby|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>|
|Component:||ruby||Assignee:||Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora>|
|Status:||NEW ---||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||29||CC:||bkabrda, mtasaka, tagoh, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vondruch|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2016-07-19 20:51:25 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Miroslav Suchý 2013-08-27 08:46:23 UTC
Description of problem: If some gem (see bug 912960 for example) create .so file and provide header file, it should be probably stored in vendorhdrdir: pkg-config --variable=vendorhdrdir ruby /usr/include/vendor_ruby And even if we come in bug 912960 with different resolution, ruby somehow expect vendorhdrdir and use it for something. I'm not really sure for what. But we may want to create this directory and own it.
Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:00:58 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 20:51:25 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2016-07-27 14:26:42 UTC
Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2017-02-28 09:34:56 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'.
Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 09:09:38 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '26'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Comment 6 Jan Kurik 2018-08-14 11:01:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'.