Bug 1001631
Summary: | Quota: glusterfsd process crashed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Raghavendra Bhat <rabhat> |
Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Raghavendra Bhat <rabhat> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Saurabh <saujain> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | kdhananj, kparthas, mzywusko, rabhat, rgowdapp, rhs-bugs, shaines, shmohan, vagarwal, vbellur |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0.30rhs | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause:
When nameless lookup on a gfid came, posix was trying to resolve it using the gfid handle by doing readlink on it. The return value of readlink was received in a wrong variable.
Consequence:
The above cause made posix think readlink was successfu, despite the failure and continue leading to glusterfsd process being crashed.
Fix:
Now the return value of readlink call is received in a proper variable and checked for failure before continuing.
Result:
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-27 15:34:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Raghavendra Bhat
2013-08-27 12:33:28 UTC
*** Bug 1001919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Patch was reviewed at https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/12036/ Tag v3.4.0.30rhs has this fix. Verified on 3.4.0.33rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1769.html |