Bug 1001807

Summary:	FEAT: hwcert-client should indicate why it hasn't defaulted a plan item that is present
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program	Reporter:	Rob Landry <rlandry>
Component:	Test Suite (harness)	Assignee:	Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.6.5	CC:	bbrock, gnichols, qcai, rlandry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	hwcert-client 1.6.5 R12	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Feature: The hwcert command now provides more feedback when a test is being skipped, marking "pp" to the left of the text name when a test is skipped because it previously passed.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1001831 1002768 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-13 09:57:13 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1001233

Description Rob Landry 2013-08-27 19:43:43 UTC

Description of problem:

Currently hwcert-client doesn't plan tests it doesn't need, and this is correct however it leaves it as an exercise for the user to determine why it doesn't think it needs to test something.  It would be helpful if it provided some indicator that a test was skipped for what reason.  This way it would be more clear that it isn't a basic hardware detection issue.

Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2013-09-25 01:11:55 UTC

committed to R12

Comment 5 Brian Brock 2013-10-09 15:15:45 UTC

verified in -22.el6

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-13 09:57:13 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1515.html