Bug 1003009
Summary: | Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Wolfgang Ulbrich <fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora, mnowak, notting, samuel-rhbugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | fedora:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-10-26 00:56:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Miro Hrončok
2013-08-30 13:16:41 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/gnome-colors-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-5.fc19.src.rpm - Link the start-here icon to the Fedora icon *** Bug 515280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1. icon-cache-update needs work. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache %postun and %posttrans is missing 2. use %global instead of %define 3. Since f18 we don't need anymore desitinaton dir for make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} New macro is %{make_install} Rest looks good for a first view. Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/gnome-colors-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc19.src.rpm - Use %%global instead of %%define - Use %%{make_install} - Use icon cache scriplets form wiki APPROVED ! Two minors wich you can fix before you upload to fedora git. 1. Why requires gnome-icon-theme? [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. 2. pls change Url: to URL: Rpmlint ------- Checking: gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc21.noarch.rpm gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc21.src.rpm gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins, lo gins gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gnome-colors-icon-theme/COPYING There is nothing what you can do for fix it. You only have to notice upstream about this. gnome-colors-icon-theme.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins, lo gins gnome-colors-icon-theme.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gnome-colors.googlecode.com/files/gnome-colors-src-5.5.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found This is a fault positive, the download link works well in a browser. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Note: Cannot find gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png in rpm(s) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text This is a fault positive, those files are present in the rpm. [rave@mother results]$ rpm -qlp gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc21.noarch.rpm |grep gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png /usr/share/icons/gnome-colors-common/16x16/mimetypes/gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png /usr/share/icons/gnome-colors-common/22x22/mimetypes/gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png /usr/share/icons/gnome-colors-common/24x24/mimetypes/gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png /usr/share/icons/gnome-colors-common/32x32/mimetypes/gnome-mime-text-x-copying.png - Package do not use a name that already exist Note: A package already exist with this name, please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-colors-icon-theme See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names Normal for a re-retired package. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in gnome-colors-icon-theme [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc21.noarch.rpm gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc21.src.rpm gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins, lo gins gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gnome-colors-icon-theme/COPYING There is nothing what you can do for fix it. Please notice upstream about this. gnome-colors-icon-theme.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins, lo gins gnome-colors-icon-theme.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gnome-colors.googlecode.com/files/gnome-colors-src-5.5.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found This is a fault positive, the download link works well in a browser. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint gnome-colors-icon-theme gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins -> losing, loins, lo gins gnome-colors-icon-theme.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gnome-colors-icon-theme/COPYING 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- gnome-colors-icon-theme (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh gnome-icon-theme Provides -------- gnome-colors-icon-theme: gnome-colors-icon-theme Source checksums ---------------- http://gnome-colors.googlecode.com/files/gnome-colors-src-5.5.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0b03073198dcf98925d20d8793efe4b2ad5afa5786d80ce068a5ef47e926bced CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0b03073198dcf98925d20d8793efe4b2ad5afa5786d80ce068a5ef47e926bced Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1003009 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-colors-icon-theme Short Description: GNOME-Colors icon theme Owners: churchyard Branches: f18 f19 f20 Unretired, please take ownership of devel in pkgdb and then submit a Package Change Request for the remaining desired branches. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-colors-icon-theme New Branches: f18 f19 f20 Owners: churchyard I've forgotten that this is not exactly a new package. Ownership taken. Git done (by process-git-requests). gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc19 gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc18 gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.5.1-6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-colors-icon-theme New Branches: epel7 Owners: churchyard See bz1165869 Git done (by process-git-requests). |