Bug 1003570
Summary: | Changing ACLs for directories sometimes/intermittently gives "Access denied error" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty> |
Component: | samba | Assignee: | Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | dpal, lmohanty, poelstra, rjoseph, rtalur, sbhaloth |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | ntacl | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-03 17:23:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Lalatendu Mohanty
2013-09-02 11:49:46 UTC
Correcting steps to reproduce Steps to Reproduce: 1. As "user1" form windows mount point, create a folder and create some files (xlsx files) 2. Give acls (for write, read, execute) for User2 on these files 3. On the parent folder, also give acl for full control to user2. 4. as User2, edit one the file and add some content. 5. As User1, on the parent folder, try to remove permission for user2. I have raised the priority to high because, the bug brings down the user experience heavily and creates confusion. IMHO this bug should be treated with urgent priority. I could reproduce the same issue on XFS partition exported over samba. It looks like a samba issue. The behaviour is pretty inconsistent. I don't get the error always but once the error comes, sometimes continue sets the acls, sometimes not. Also "service smb restart" on the samba server does not fix the issue. Lala, does this bug reproduce with vfs_acl_xattr? Ira, I think, I have not tried the test with "vfs_acl_xattr". Now after reading "steps to reproduce", I think it might be a "not a bug", because after changing ownership of a file to user2, can user1 remove acls of user2? Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Gluster Storage. The release for which you requested us to review, is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs/ If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Red Hat Gluster Storage, please feel free to file a new report against the current release. |