Bug 1003694
Summary: | Review Request: python-w3lib - Library of web-related functions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Bruno <dbruno> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dbruno, i, mail, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | i:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-14 03:37:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Daniel Bruno
2013-09-02 19:22:38 UTC
Are you going to support EL5/6? Yes. 1. Email address should be enclosed by <>, you can see we all do this. 2. Why do you want to support epel5? Don't you know w3lib only supports Python 2.6 or 2.7 and el5 only have 2.4.3? 3. %description is not good, This is a Python library of web-related functions, such as: remove comments, or tags from HTML snippets extract base url from HTML snippets translate entites on HTML strings encoding mulitpart/form-data convert raw HTTP headers to dicts and vice-versa construct HTTP auth header converting HTML pages to unicode RFC-compliant url joining sanitize urls (like browsers do) extract arguments from urls should be This is a Python library of web-related functions, such as: - Remove comments, or tags from HTML snippets - Extract base url from HTML snippets - Translate entites on HTML strings - Encoding mulitpart/form-data - Convert raw HTTP headers to dicts and vice-versa - Construct HTTP auth header - Converting HTML pages to unicode - RFC-compliant url joining - Sanitize urls (like browsers do) - Extract arguments from urls 4. BuildRequires: python-devel should be BuildRequires: python2-devel Spec URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/w3lib/python-w3lib.spec SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/w3lib/python-w3lib-1.3-1.fc19.src.rpm 1. Fixed 2. I'm sorry, I mistook with another package that i'm working. 3. Fixed 4. Fixed If this doesn't support EPEL5(As I've said it really does), please remove: 1. BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 2. rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install 3. Whole %clean section 4. %defattr(-,root,root,-) 5. %if 0%{?fedora} < 13 || 0%{?rhel} < 6 %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} %endif And, bump your spec release number to 2 if you like. Spec URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/w3lib/python-w3lib.spec SRPM URL: http://dbruno.fedorapeople.org/w3lib/python-w3lib-1.3-2.fc19.src.rpm All topics were fixed. New issues: 1.We just get news that %{__python} is deprecated like python-devel, now it's better to use %{__python2}. 2.If nothing in %clean, don't mention it anymore. Well before I run fedora-review later, you don't need to fix them. Please fix above issues after I return the result of fedora-review. *** Bug 1005769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Seems you've corrected them, nice. 1. CLEAN rm -rf %{buildroot} IN %install SECTION BEFORE SCM. 2. python-w3lib.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code APPROVED. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-w3lib Short Description: Library of web-related functions Owners: dbruno Branches: f18 f19 f20 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Hi, It seems that you never build it for rawhide. Did you forget to do that? Thanks. Hello, I was looking in the logs, and I believe that I did it. I'm sorry for the late response. (In reply to Daniel Bruno from comment #13) > Hello, > > I was looking in the logs, and I believe that I did it. > > I'm sorry for the late response. Have a nice weekend. But I can see that it's not. Please search at http://dl.fedoraproject.org or http://pkgs.org And you never do what I've told you in comment 9: Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #15) > And you never do what I've told you in comment 9: > > Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} Hello, The package was already built to rawhide. So, about comment 9, do you recommend to build the package again without this line, or just do it in the next release? Thank you Do it in the next release, fix it in git. OK. I saw you built it in Koji, fine now. |