Bug 1003845
Summary: | Samba packages other than samba_glusterfs should not be dependent on glusterfs packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | surabhi <sbhaloth> |
Component: | samba | Assignee: | Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | surabhi <sbhaloth> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | bturner, dpal, lmohanty, rjoseph, rtalur, sdharane, surs, vbellur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | package | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-03 17:22:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
surabhi
2013-09-03 11:02:20 UTC
As Expected results states: Out of 14 samba packages only one is dependent on glusterfs so even if glusterfs is not installed the 13 samba packages should get installed and should not show dependency errors. Problem only occurs when samba update is tried with gluster not being installed. Changing the summary to reflect this point. As per discussion it is clarified that this issue might not come for RHEL/upstream.But for RHS the samba packages other than glusterfs_samba should not be dependent upon glusterfs packages. Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Gluster Storage. The release for which you requested us to review, is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs/ If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Red Hat Gluster Storage, please feel free to file a new report against the current release. |