| Summary: | quota: ping_pong issue | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Saurabh <saujain> |
| Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Susant Kumar Palai <spalai> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Saurabh <saujain> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.1 | CC: | kparthas, mzywusko, rgowdapp, rhs-bugs, saujain, shaines, spalai, vagarwal, vbellur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-10-23 06:54:33 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Saurabh
2013-09-04 10:33:58 UTC
Saurabh, I am not able to reproduce the bug in my setup. ping_pong works as expected. Couple of observations: * enabling/disabling quota had no effect on lock rate * when only third instance of ping_pong is killed, lock rate doesn't shoot up significantly. However, when 2 out of 3 instances is killed, the remaining instance achieves locking rate equal to what a single instance of ping_pong achieves. * I am using the same version of glusterfs as you. Can you please confirm this is the behaviour in your setup too? regards, Raghavendra. Tried to reproduce the issue in my setup (rhs-2.1). Ping-pong worked as expected. It passed both lock coherency and I/O coherency test. Closing the bug as not reproducible in current release-glusterfs3.4.0.35rhs. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html |