| Summary: | vim built without x11 support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rob <faorg-lists> |
| Component: | vim | Assignee: | Karsten Hopp <karsten> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | karsten |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-08 18:49:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Rob
2013-09-06 15:22:42 UTC
vim from the vim-enhanced package is intentionally built without X support so that you can have a minimal system without any X libraries. What you're looking for is in the vim-x11 package, either the GUI version gvim or the terminal version vimx Yes, vimx is what I was looking for but didn't know it existed and wasted a lot of time working out what was wrong with vim and rebuilding it. There is also no vimdiffx etc. Wouldn't it be better for both packages to install it as 'vim' but you would choose which one to install based on the dependencies or type of system you were building? |