Bug 1005522

This package built on koji:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5909474

For F18 I unwisely decided to drop all the individual src packages
that are a part of Haskell Platform and instead using subpackaging.
At the time I seemed to simplify bootstrapping a ghc version
but I see now it as a mistake that should be undone.
It is much easier to maintain individual packages for libraries
beyond ghc itself.

Original review is bug 550102.  Thanks!

Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl.spec
SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl-2.1.2-26.fc19.src.rpm

add static provides

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
     Note: See rpmlint output
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 983040 bytes in 100 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1054720 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-mtl-2.1.2-26.fc19.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-mtl-devel-2.1.2-26.fc19.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-mtl-2.1.2-26.fc19.src.rpm
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Monad -> Mona, Gonad, Mon ad
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Monad -> Mona, Gonad, Mon ad
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, secs, pecs
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pox
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, schooling
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Monad -> Mona, Gonad, Mon ad
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Monad -> Mona, Gonad, Mon ad
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US monad -> nomad, gonad, Mona
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cecs -> ceca, secs, pecs
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdx -> pd, pix, pox
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US edu -> ed, educ, due
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpj -> mph, mp, mpg
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US springschool -> spring school, spring-school, schooling
ghc-mtl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings.

Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint ghc-mtl ghc-mtl-devel
ghc-mtl.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/mtl-2.1.2/libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.4.2.so ['/builddir/build/BUILD/haskell-platform-2012.4.0.0/packages/transformers-0.3.0.0/dist/build', '/usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/base-4.5.1.0', '/usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/integer-gmp-0.4.0.0', '/usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/ghc-prim-0.2.0.0', '/usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2']
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'

Requires
--------
ghc-mtl (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ghc(base-4.5.1.0-6e4c9bdc36eeb9121f27ccbbcb62e3f3)
    ghc(transformers-0.3.0.0-8e66ecc7d4dae2b07b2b5406908c70e4)
    libHSbase-4.5.1.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-prim-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit)
    libHSinteger-gmp-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit)
    libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

ghc-mtl-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    ghc(mtl-2.1.2-02e701f9b1590ee88a0b5b0bd5d93a29)
    ghc-compiler
    ghc-devel(base-4.5.1.0-6e4c9bdc36eeb9121f27ccbbcb62e3f3)
    ghc-devel(transformers-0.3.0.0-8e66ecc7d4dae2b07b2b5406908c70e4)
    ghc-mtl(x86-64)

Provides
--------
ghc-mtl:
    ghc(mtl-2.1.2-02e701f9b1590ee88a0b5b0bd5d93a29)
    ghc-mtl
    ghc-mtl(x86-64)
    libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit)

ghc-mtl-devel:
    ghc-devel(mtl-2.1.2-02e701f9b1590ee88a0b5b0bd5d93a29)
    ghc-mtl-devel
    ghc-mtl-devel(x86-64)
    ghc-mtl-static

Unversioned so-files
--------------------
ghc-mtl: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/mtl-2.1.2/libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.4.2.so

Source checksums
----------------
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/2.1.2/mtl-2.1.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 8c775764333420a4391823f9cb9b640306a262552280ea9bbdd2ca11194a8bef
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8c775764333420a4391823f9cb9b640306a262552280ea9bbdd2ca11194a8bef

Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1005522
Buildroot used: fedora-19-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG

Successful Koji builds for F18, F19, and F20:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6241121
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6241122
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6241120

Thanks for reviewing


Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-mtl
New Branches: f19 f20
Owners: petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig

Git done (by process-git-requests).

haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20,ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20,ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20,ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20,ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20

Package haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20, ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20, ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20 ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20 ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22821/haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20,ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20,ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-27.fc20, ghc-mtl-2.1.2-27.fc20, ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-27.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.