| Summary: | Manual autodiscovery is confusing | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Operations Network | Reporter: | Viet Nguyen <vnguyen> | ||||||||
| Component: | Usability | Assignee: | Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Armine Hovsepyan <ahovsepy> | ||||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Version: | JON 3.2 | CC: | ahovsepy, jshaughn, mfoley, myarboro, tsegismo | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | ER02 | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | JON 3.3.0 | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-12-11 14:03:51 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
I agree that this is silly terminology and should be changed. For me that's enough to satisfy this request. A special case button? I could live with it but that's a UX thing. As a side note, if we really do work for this I think think the same sort of operation should exist on RHQ Agent resources. Pushing due to time constraints. (In reply to Jay Shaughnessy from comment #1) > I agree that this is silly terminology and should be changed. For me that's > enough to satisfy this request. > > A special case button? I could live with it but that's a UX thing. > > As a side note, if we really do work for this I think think the same sort of > operation should exist on RHQ Agent resources. > > Pushing due to time constraints. What about just changing the display name of this operation to "Run discovery"? This operation is actually all but "manual". It triggers auto-discovery, but out of the standard agent schedule. If the name satisfies everyone, the changes is very trivial and the fix can be pushed for ER2
Since you would not let this go I changed to "Run Autodiscovery" :) I think we should keep the "Auto" just fr consistency with the "Autodiscovery Queue".
Any other enhancement (i.e. a button) should be created as a new RFE.
release/jon3.3.x commit eaf199722b103b98f9f04303364952d3c845d789
Author: Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn>
Date: Tue Aug 26 12:01:25 2014 -0400
[1006487] Manual autodiscovery is confusing
Changed to "Run Autodiscovery"
Moving to ON_QA as available for test with the following brew build: https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com//buildinfo?buildID=381194 Created attachment 934840 [details]
run_autodiscovery
Created attachment 934841 [details]
run_autodiscovery_pl
verified in JON 3.3 ER02 screen-shots attached |
Created attachment 796082 [details] screenshot Description of problem: 1. "Manual Autodiscovery" sounds like an oxymoron. What about just "Manual Discovery"? 2. This perhaps should be a first-class operation. I'd like to see a button to trigger manual discovery on Platform view.