Bug 1006638

Summary:	WS-I Basic Profile 1.2 and 2.0 support
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6	Reporter:	Tadayoshi Sato <tasato>
Component:	Web Services	Assignee:	Jimmy Wilson <jawilson>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:	Peter Mackay <pmackay>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Lucas Costi <lcosti>
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2.3	CC:	asoldano, bmaxwell, cdewolf, jawilson, mmusaji, myarboro, rsvoboda
Target Milestone:	GA	Keywords:	Documentation, Triaged
Target Release:	EAP 6.3.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	In addition to WS-I Basic Profile 1.1, this release of JBoss EAP 6 now supports WS-I Basic Profile 1.2 and 2.0.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-08-19 12:49:24 UTC	Type:	Feature Request
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tadayoshi Sato 2013-09-11 01:34:05 UTC

Document URL:
https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/113373
"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Supported Standards"

Section Number and Name:
"Web Services Standards and APIs"

Describe the issue:
In the above document, Red Hat officially declares EAP 6 supports WS-I Basic Profile 1.1, which is a very old spec. However, according to Jim Ma JBoss WS already tested WS-I BP 1.2 and 2.0 and is ready to support them. Why not officially declare WS-I BP 2.0 support?

Suggestions for improvement:
Productisation/QE should test WS-I BP 2.0 compatibility against EAP 6 and declare the support for 2.0 in the above document.

Comment 2 Mustafa Musaji 2013-09-11 09:36:09 UTC

Tadayoshi

We can amend that document ourselves but we do need Alessio to confirm and from his last [private] comment I don't think we can say it's "officially" supported. Perhaps we can write a KCS instead describing why we can't say we officially support them specs but we do adhere to them the best we can in 6.1.0?

Comment 6 sgilda 2014-05-13 18:31:18 UTC

Lucas, why does this one still have a status of NEW? :-)

Comment 7 Lucas Costi 2014-05-13 22:47:47 UTC

Sande, see Mark's comment in Comment 3. KCS will need to be checked and updated ; at the moment the bug in it's current state will make it into the 6.3.0 release notes in the proper section.

Comment 10 Rostislav Svoboda 2014-05-14 06:57:58 UTC

Verified in RN - "JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform-6.3.0_Release_Notes-6.3-en-US-6.3.0-4"

Moving to Jimmy for KB article update.

Comment 13 Rostislav Svoboda 2014-06-24 06:48:13 UTC

WS-I Basic Profile 1.2 and 2.0 was confirmed with EAP 6.2.0
There were changes needed in CXF codebase to pass it - so it's not covered in EAP 6.0 or 6.1.

Comment 14 Rostislav Svoboda 2014-11-10 12:17:00 UTC

Will you modify https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/113373 based on comment 13 ? Or can be this BZ closed ?

Comment 18 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:50:25 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days