Bug 1006898

Summary:	References to replace-brick
Product:	Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Anush Shetty <ashetty>
Component:	doc-Administration_Guide	Assignee:	Bhavana <bmohanra>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.1	CC:	asriram, divya, lmohanty, mhideo, rhs-bugs, rwheeler, sasundar, ssaha, ssamanta, storage-doc, vagarwal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-03-11 10:32:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Anush Shetty 2013-09-11 13:22:26 UTC

Document URL: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/2.1/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html

Section Number and Name: 10.4. Migrating Volumes

Describe the issue:  Our admin guide contains references to 'replace-brick'. Currently we use the workaround of doing an add-brick and then doing a remove-brick instead of using replace-brick. 

Also, the note in the chapter refers to the known issues in "Red Hat Storage 2.0 Update 4 Release Notes"



Suggestions for improvement: 

Additional information:

Comment 1 Lalatendu Mohanty 2013-09-12 07:29:52 UTC

Marking this urgent as we have few bugs for replace-brick i.e. BZ 1006899 ,BZ 1006901 in samba. The work-around works for samba but replace-brick does not. So it we are removing replace brick section from Admin guide , we can reduce the priority of the samba bugs or even close them.

Comment 2 Bhavana 2013-09-19 06:54:53 UTC

Hi Anush,

The issue is fixed in bug 947158.

Made the changes as suggested.

https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/2.1/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#sect-User_Guide-Managing_Volumes-Migrating

Comment 3 shylesh 2014-06-19 09:58:13 UTC

According to sayan's comment from the bug 947158 replace-brick supports for commit option, hence reducing the severity.

Comment 4 SATHEESARAN 2014-07-24 09:49:13 UTC

(In reply to Bhavana from comment #2)
> Hi Anush,
> 
> The issue is fixed in bug 947158.
> 
> Made the changes as suggested.
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/2.1/html-
> single/Administration_Guide/index.html#sect-User_Guide-Managing_Volumes-
> Migrating

Bhavana,

The issue stated by Anush is not yet resolved with the change.

Anush was suggesting a way to replace a brick, without using "replace-brick" command. This needs to be documented.
I have raised the similar bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074415
and provided the steps in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074415#c1

Probably https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074415 should be closed as DUP of this bug.

Comment 5 Divya 2015-03-11 10:32:10 UTC

Based on Comment 4, closing this bug as duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074415.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1074415 ***