Bug 1007192 (CVE-2013-5720)

Summary:	CVE-2013-5720 wireshark: RTPS dissector crash (wnpa-sec-2013-57)
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	Murray McAllister <mmcallis>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	unspecified	CC:	dapospis, huzaifas, lemenkov, phatina, rvokal, security-response-team, vdanen, vkrizan
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-09-13 04:44:13 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1007254, 1007261, 1007278
Bug Blocks:	1007214

Description Murray McAllister 2013-09-12 05:35:23 UTC

Ben Schmidt discovered a buffer overflow flaw in the Wireshark RTPS dissector. Wireshark could crash if it read a malformed packet off a network, or opened a malicious dump file. This issue affects Wireshark versions 1.10.0 to 1.10.1 and 1.8.0 to 1.8.9. It is fixed in versions 1.10.2 and 1.8.10.

References:

https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2013-57.html

Comment 1 Murray McAllister 2013-09-12 08:14:03 UTC

Created wireshark tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1007261]

Comment 3 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2013-09-13 04:20:51 UTC

Upstream bug: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9019 (currently closed)

Patch: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=51213

Comment 4 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2013-09-13 04:21:32 UTC

Statement:

Not Vulnerable. This issue does not affect the version of wireshark as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6.

Comment 5 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2013-09-13 04:44:13 UTC

This issue affects the version of wireshark as shipped with Fedora 18 and 19.

Comment 8 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2014-01-21 13:33:39 UTC

I dont have access to the closed bug or the cap file, so this one will need to be SanityOnly