Bug 1008227

Summary: SSD cache
Product: [Retired] Fedora Documentation Reporter: Pete Travis <me>
Component: storage-administration-guideAssignee: Pete Travis <me>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Docs QA <docs-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: agk, ddomingo, ignatenko, jeremy, jreznik, kzak, nobody, rdieter, rolf, rtguille, stickster, zach
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Tracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 998543 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-31 19:59:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 998543, 999690, 1000078, 1000817, 1001120, 1003207, 1003208    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Pete Travis 2013-09-15 19:28:38 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998543 +++

This is a tracking bug for Change: SSD cache
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSD_cache

Using recent kernel (3.9 and later) features for (fast) SSD caching of (slow) ordinary hard disks.

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-21 13:35:33 EDT ---

I'll build a bcache-tools RPM and a dm-cache-utils rpm (actually bcache-tools is already available here: bcache-tools-20130820-0.1.fc19.src.rpm).

I'll follow the procedure as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-24 11:51:34 EDT ---

Tried to create a dmcache-utils package as well (Bug 1000078) but it doesn't look really useful. So I'll focus on bcache-tools first. For that I still need a sponsor.

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-27 06:52:40 EDT ---

I closed Bug 1000078 since good userland support requires LVM2 to support dm-cache. Which will happen 'in the future', but F20 doesn't look feasible to me.

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:21:30 EDT ---

Create Bug 1003207 (bcache support for dracut) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21.

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:25:06 EDT ---

Create Bug 1003208 (bcache support for anaconda) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21.

--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-09-09 04:18:18 EDT ---

Test day planned: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/415

--------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185336.html

Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.

Comment 1 Pete Travis 2014-01-26 22:30:28 UTC
The Storage guide seems like a fitting place to document bcache, reassigning there.

Comment 2 Pete Travis 2017-08-31 19:59:00 UTC
Issues for this guide have moved to pagure, I have created https://pagure.io/storage-administration-guide/issue/3 to track.