Bug 1008430
Summary: | different "Signing Key:" on 5.5.0 and 5.6.0 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> | ||||
Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Tomas Lestach <tlestach> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 560 | CC: | mmraka, mzazrivec | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-09 09:14:09 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 924189 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jan Hutař
2013-09-16 11:06:08 UTC
RPM have this: $ rpm -Kv rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pragha-1.1.1-3.fc19.jhutar.x86_64.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pragha-1.1.1-3.fc19.jhutar.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8fae20ca: NOKEY Header SHA1 digest: OK (17220397b416ddff8d549aeb2f2dc601c0b2caad) V4 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8fae20ca: NOKEY MD5 digest: OK (b9961e922505c04dbe6bda0d196cc3bb) After importing attached package to my machine, I see: Signing Key: c3db03298fae20ca and it was detected as *gpg* package key type. We agreed with Milan that it seems that backend/rhnpush does not correctly parse this type of signature. We need to start support pgp signatures to resolve this BZ/RFE. Not a regression. We have re-reviewed this bug, as part of an ongoing effort to improve Satellite/Proxy feature and bug updates, review and backlog. This is a low priority bug and has no currently open customer cases. While this bug may still valid, we do not see it being implemented prior to the EOL of the Satellite 5.x product. As such, this is being CLOSED DEFERRED. Closing now to help set customer expectations as early as possible. You are welcome to re-open this bug if needed. |