| Summary: | abrt fails to detect oops | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot> |
| Component: | abrt | Assignee: | abrt <abrt-devel-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | abrt-devel-list, ars_1, dvlasenk, iprikryl, jfilak, mikhail.v.gavrilov, mmilata, nobody, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-19 10:22:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Nicolas Mailhot
2013-09-16 16:20:47 UTC
Thank you for the report! ABRT doesn't detect lot of oopses coming from kernel/lockdep.c [1] and I'm not sure if ABRT should support all of them. We have to ask kernel folks which oopses do they want to see in Bugzilla. Not supported oops types: INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected INFO: inconsistent lock state INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected INFO: suspicious RCU usage. 1: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/lockdep.c If it was not useful to kernel people they wouldn't activate the check in Fedora kernels in the first place, it's not like it was a user setting… CCing Anton because he has the right domain knowledge. Anton, could you please tell us which oopses are kernel people interested in? Jakub, I prefer to keep the status quo for now. Fedora kernel bug triagers are already overloaded, let them be focused on panics. Nicolas, your request has been recorded and the next such request will get more decision weight. Nowadays kernel people are interested and prefer Abrt team to resolve bug 1000000 as soon as possible. :) thanks, This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Per comment #5. *** Bug 1284286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |