| Summary: | In JBDSIS 7.0.0.beta2 - The SOA5 category includes Drools6 which may be incompatible with BRMS5 and SOA5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Fuse Service Works 6 | Reporter: | Len DiMaggio <ldimaggi> | ||||
| Component: | Tooling | Assignee: | Paul Leacu <pleacu> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Len DiMaggio <ldimaggi> | ||||
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | atangrin, soa-p-jira | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-23 17:57:57 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Len DiMaggio
2013-09-16 16:59:31 UTC
Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 JBDSIS 7.0.0.Beta2 p2 update site installation screen capture. Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Hey Kris - The question is: Will the 6.0.0 JBoss Drools works okay with the SOA 5.x compatibility installation (any server incompatibilities, etc)? Thanks Created attachment 798380 [details]
Screenshot
Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 The idea is that the Drools & jBPM plugins would support older versions too. So, based on the ability to configure your own runtime and backwards compatibility of resource files, that should be possible. Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Kris, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 6.0 always used for rule validation inside the editor etc.? Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Any more discussion on this one? Given the component tech leads comments and the fact that is assigned back to me - I plan on closing this JIRA tomorrow if there are no further comments. Paul Leacu <pleacu> updated the status of jira JBTIS-178 to Resolved Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 From Kris - there is no issue - the current drools/jBPM has backward compatibility built into them: The idea is that the Drools & jBPM plugins would support older versions too. So, based on the ability to configure your own runtime and backwards compatibility of resource files, that should be possible. |