Bug 1009272
Summary: | prosody certificate files owned by root not prosody, and not owned by the RPM package | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
Component: | prosody | Assignee: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora, jamielinux, mcepl, mcepl, redhat-bugzilla |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-10-02 06:52:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adam Williamson
2013-09-18 06:10:43 UTC
a) This is certainly bug and I will take a look at it. b) We in the XMPP world are in a little bit different league than your normal website owners. We don't use self-signed certificates that much (because most server-to-server XMPP communication has been encrypted for years), so we usually use real certificates from real established CAs. And if the money is an issue, then for example StartSSL (https://www.startssl.com/) provides XMPP certificate for one server and year for free. That could the explanation why nobody noticed this bug so far. I already reported the issue from comment #1 some time ago and it definately got fixed: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/prosody.git/commit/?id=7083ae937f7278adffac732392556b1fa0bef38c mcepl: I figured I'd use a self-signed cert just to start with for testing, I thought that'd be fairly common at least. It takes, like, at least two minutes for me to log in to startssl and create a new cert :P robert: aha. It looks like that never got pushed anywhere older than F20, though: F19 is still on 0.8.2-8. So, mcepl, looks like you just need to push out 0.8.2-9 as an update for stable releases. Looks like it was submitted/pushed stable for el5, but nothing else :) Sounds like I've made changes in the git, but forgot to build; sorry :/ Just building for F-18 and F-19 branches should be enough. @Matěj will you take care of that or should I? Finally, it is ok for F-18; I just forgot F-19... I'm building the package, update will come soon. prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19 ah yeah, looks OK for f18 indeed. Package prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17204/prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). prosody-0.8.2-10.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |