| Summary: | RPM packages with group "Unspecified" | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Cline <matt> | ||||
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | dennis, rvokal | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-20 16:38:19 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag ... All current versions of Fedora (and their respective RPM versions) treat the Group tag as optional. Packages may include a Group: field for compatibility with EPEL, but are not required to do so. ... Ergo, closing as NOTABUG. |
Created attachment 800327 [details] RPM packages which have "Unspecified" as their group There are a number of Fedora packages (installed/updated via yum) which have a group of "Unspecified". Attached is a sorted list of such packages on my system, generated with "rpm -q -g Unspecified". Of course, there's likely even more such packages which I don't have installed.