Bug 1010293 (JCache, JSR107)
Summary: | Review Request: JCache - JSR107 API for javax.cache | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pete MacKinnon <pmackinn> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | puntogil, tcallawa | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-13 15:56:21 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Pete MacKinnon
2013-09-20 13:07:20 UTC
Created attachment 800669 [details] review notes seem all ok, but as a precaution i would ask the license information adding a new tiket on Fedora Legal Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 regards i would like to take this review Ugh. I really hate these Oracle Java Specification licenses (I think Sun is to blame, though). This license technically applies to the specification, but it places restrictions on code that implements the specification, specifically, restrictions on modifying the code. This license is clearly non-free. I can somewhat recognize the desire for them to try to have compliant implementations of the "specification", but I don't see why it has to be bound in copyright restrictions. Trademark "JCache", then only permit compatible implementations to use the "JCache" mark. If it is incompatible, it can exist, it simply cannot use the trademark. The only good news here is that this "specification" license will expire in either 2 years from the date of the release of the "pre-version" (currently that would be August 8 2015), or when the Specification goes final (which it seems on track to do... http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107). Unless Oracle/Greg Luck decide to drop this license, I think we'll have to wait for this problem to resolve itself with time. I'm sorry. :( Thanks Tom for the clarification, and i apologize for the noise |