Bug 1010733

Summary: [abrt] evolution-3.8.5-2.fc19: g_strfreev: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mikhail <mikhail.v.gavrilov>
Component: evolutionAssignee: Milan Crha <mcrha>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha, mikhail.v.gavrilov
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:fbb1e23c1593fb58d289d2745301f948eee1726c
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-17 17:18:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages
none
I am sure that my memory now is fine none

Description Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:21 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
evolution-3.8.5-2.fc19

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.7
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        evolution
crash_function: g_strfreev
executable:     /usr/bin/evolution
kernel:         3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64.debug
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #6 g_strfreev at gstrfuncs.c:2406
 #7 g_themed_icon_finalize at gthemedicon.c:188
 #9 _gtk_icon_helper_clear at gtkiconhelper.c:49
 #10 gtk_cell_renderer_pixbuf_set_property at gtkcellrendererpixbuf.c:374
 #11 object_set_property at gobject.c:1358
 #12 g_object_set_valist at gobject.c:1953
 #13 g_object_set at gobject.c:2059
 #14 folder_tree_render_icon at em-folder-tree.c:861
 #15 apply_cell_attributes at gtkcellarea.c:1284
 #16 g_hash_table_foreach at ghash.c:1526

Comment 1 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:26 UTC
Created attachment 801364 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:29 UTC
Created attachment 801365 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:33 UTC
Created attachment 801366 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:36 UTC
Created attachment 801367 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:40 UTC
Created attachment 801368 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:43 UTC
Created attachment 801369 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:46 UTC
Created attachment 801370 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:50 UTC
Created attachment 801371 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:53 UTC
Created attachment 801372 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 10 Mikhail 2013-09-22 21:15:56 UTC
Created attachment 801373 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 11 Milan Crha 2013-09-23 12:06:41 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. The crash happened due to "double free or corruption (out)", according to the backtrace data, which seems like a memory corruption bug, in a sense of some function the code wrote to memory which it should not (as that 'double free' suggests, the function could even free some data it didn't belong to it, thus the correct free call failed in this way). I cannot tell from the backtrace where exactly this memory corruption happened, neither why, because the backtrace "only" shows where the corruption was detected. I'm afraid I'm not able to do anything with this, unless you've some reproducer or steps/hints for the reproducer.

Comment 12 Mikhail 2013-09-26 19:37:12 UTC
Created attachment 803557 [details]
I am sure that my memory now is fine

Comment 13 Milan Crha 2013-09-27 08:50:12 UTC
(In reply to Mikhail from comment #12)
> I am sure that my memory now is fine

Yes, I've no doubt, and to be honest, when I speak about "memory corruption", then I do not mean the "hardware memory corruption", but "memory corruption caused by the software", like if the code accesses already freed memory, tries to write to it (possibly overwriting other object which was placed on its place after the first free) and so on. These issues can happen in complex code, and can be caused by many factors.

Comment 14 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-09-04 14:29:17 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 15 Fedora End Of Life 2015-01-09 19:56:34 UTC
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora 
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is 
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no 
longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will
be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 16 Fedora End Of Life 2015-02-17 17:18:25 UTC
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.