Bug 1011877
Summary: | Increase log level of "Sending update ..." log entry to INFO | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Liushihui <shihliu> |
Component: | virt-who | Assignee: | Radek Novacek <rnovacek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | gaoshang <sgao> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.6 | CC: | bkearney, liliu, ovasik, qianzhan, rbalakri, sgao, shihliu |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-who-0.10-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 07:13:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 971511 |
Description
Liushihui
2013-09-25 10:08:41 UTC
I don't consider this as a bug. These two lines can be quite useful for debugging and since the messages are only on the DEBUG level, I think it's OK to have them there. On the other hand, it could be useful to increase the level of "Sending update..." log message to INFO. Do you agree with suggested solution? Yes, I agree with you , increase the level of "Sending update..." log message to INFO should be more clear. (In reply to Radek Novacek from comment #2) > I don't consider this as a bug. These two lines can be quite useful for > debugging and since the messages are only on the DEBUG level, I think it's > OK to have them there. > > On the other hand, it could be useful to increase the level of "Sending > update..." log message to INFO. > > Do you agree with suggested solution? This bug is fixed upstream and will be resolved by rebase of virt-who, see bug 1002640. This bug is fixed by rebase to virt-who-0.10-1.el6. Verified on virt-who-0.10-4.el6.noarch. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1513.html |