Bug 101210

Summary: Consider OOo 1.1 for the next beta.
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Beta Reporter: Nick Marsh <nmarsh1>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Havoc Pennington <hp>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: beta1Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://download.services.openoffice.org/ooo/dev_docs/source/1.1rc2/features.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-07 08:15:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nick Marsh 2003-07-30 01:19:56 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.0.1)
Gecko/20030306 Camino/0.7

Description of problem:
Please consider upgrading to OOo 1.1. Even though it's a RC, it's 1000x faster
than OOo 1.0.X. The benefits to the RHL project will outwiegh the risks.

Change log is at:  
http://download.services.openoffice.org/ooo/dev_docs/source/1.1rc2/features.html



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHL

Actual Results:  Many packages are out of data, OOo is one of them.

Expected Results:  RHL should be more on the "bleeding edge".

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-07-30 05:04:58 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101207 ***

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2004-10-07 08:15:01 UTC
closed as dup of 101207