Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
(In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #3)
> I suppose it should work fine with build 74.
> Can we close it?
win2012 still hit the same issue with build74,both vioscsi and viostor are not digitally signed.
(In reply to lijin from comment #4)
> (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #3)
> > I suppose it should work fine with build 74.
> > Can we close it?
>
> win2012 still hit the same issue with build74,both vioscsi and viostor are
> not digitally signed.
Please post sigverif.txt file.
(In reply to lijin from comment #6)
> Created attachment 840690[details]
> sigverif.txt
>
> Hi Vadim,
>
> Attachment is the sigverif.txt file,anything else please let me know.
Thanks,
let's wait when drivers from build74 will be signed by MS Windows Hardware Compatibility Publisher and then recheck it again. (Hopefully in the first part of January 2014)
Best regards,
Vadim
(In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #7)
> (In reply to lijin from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 840690[details]
> > sigverif.txt
> >
> > Hi Vadim,
> >
> > Attachment is the sigverif.txt file,anything else please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> let's wait when drivers from build74 will be signed by MS Windows Hardware
> Compatibility Publisher and then recheck it again. (Hopefully in the first
> part of January 2014)
>
> Best regards,
> Vadim
Do you mean we only need to run sigverif test cases for virtio-win whql'ed builds ?
(In reply to Mike Cao from comment #11)
> (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #7)
> > (In reply to lijin from comment #6)
> > > Created attachment 840690[details]
> > > sigverif.txt
> > >
> > > Hi Vadim,
> > >
> > > Attachment is the sigverif.txt file,anything else please let me know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > let's wait when drivers from build74 will be signed by MS Windows Hardware
> > Compatibility Publisher and then recheck it again. (Hopefully in the first
> > part of January 2014)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Vadim
>
> Do you mean we only need to run sigverif test cases for virtio-win whql'ed
> builds ?
Right. sigverif is a tool for searching system files not digitally signed by Microsoft.
Best regards,
Vadim.