Bug 1012873

Summary: static test should check provides static not requires
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component: fedora-reviewAssignee: Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: leamas.alec, pingou, sochotni
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc19 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 10:37:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
this trival untested patch should hopefully fix the problem none

Description Jens Petersen 2013-09-27 10:03:51 UTC
Created attachment 803856 [details]
this trival untested patch should hopefully fix the problem

Description of problem:
fedora-review checks for static libraries in devel packages, etc.
If the devel package with *.a provides %{name}-static then it
should be okay.  However fedora-review seems to be do this
incorrectly - it is checks the devel package requires for
%{name}-static not the provides.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.5.0

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run fedora-review on Haskell library package review with provides for static
   (Haskell libraries include static libs in -devel)

Actual results:
1. fedora-review still complains about -devel not providing -static.

Expected results:
1. warning to be skipped when provides there

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2013-11-18 05:28:18 UTC
Ping :)

Anything I can do to help get this included?

Comment 2 Alec Leamas 2013-11-20 15:55:35 UTC
I pushed a tentative fix to devel: http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/FedoraReview.git/commit/?id=c7eef8b . Could you do some testing on current devel branch?

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2013-11-21 10:33:28 UTC
Thanks!  I tested git devel e2d22d8 and yes it seems to fix this problem.

Comment 4 Alec Leamas 2013-11-21 10:37:34 UTC
Thanks for spotting this! As you noted, it was a trivial copy-paste error which have slipped through reviews and testing.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2013-12-13 14:59:20 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc18

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-12-13 14:59:58 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.5.1-1.el6

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-12-13 15:01:15 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc19

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-12-19 07:05:58 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-01-07 01:20:37 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-01-07 09:35:59 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2014-01-07 09:40:54 UTC
fedora-review-0.5.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.