Bug 1013949

Summary: Problematic shapes for some letters of the macedonian alphabet.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Petar <pvelkovski>
Component: liberation-fontsAssignee: vishal vijayraghavan <vvijayra>
Status: ASSIGNED --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: bbarve, dmjpp, fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, petersen, prigupta, psatpute, pvelkovski, vishalvijayraghavan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-08 11:43:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Shoes how the letters look like, and what they should look like.
none
Book scan showing GJE' (U+0453) and GHE' (U+0433) in italic
none
Magazine scan showing GJE' (U+0453) and GHE' (U+0433) in italic none

Description Petar 2013-10-01 06:36:47 UTC
Created attachment 805748 [details]
Shoes how the letters look like, and what they should look like.

Description of problem:
The shape of the Regular (Normal) "Cyrillic
macedonian small letter be" looks. It looks like the italic form minus the slant which is wrong!

Also the letters "macedonian cyrilic ghe" and "macedonian cyrillic gje" look inconsistent in italic form. The "macedonian cyrilic gje" should look same as "macedonian cyrilic ghe" with an added accent.

I'm attaching a pdf file that should explain the problem.

Comment 1 Pravin Satpute 2013-12-02 16:02:45 UTC
So looks like there is little bit difference between Serbian and macedonian. Presently assumption is both Serbian and macedonian is same.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849  some attachement here can show it.

I think i need to remove some of it for macedonian.

Comment 2 Petar 2013-12-03 00:07:28 UTC
Pravin Satpute I find the whole situation a bit confusing concerning the Serbian version, at least when the "b" (be) letter is concerned. Serbia and Macedonia used to be a part of a same country, Yugoslavia, and our alphabets were (and should still be) "almost" the same.

Just take a look at the wikipedia page for the Serbian cyrilic alphabet - https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%BF%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D1%9B%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0, or the book scan from year 1818 on the same page - https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0:Srpski_rjecnik_s.jpg, and you might come to conclusion that the regular form for their "b" (be) letter should be as the one I'm asking to be fixed in the macedonian version. The italic version, as I said is probably correct, although I fint it to be somehow too thick at the top part.

But this is the easiest part of correcting the bug I opened, since it only requires removing few rules, as long as we speak about the "be". I even managed to do this on my own using font gorge, even though I have never used it, or any other font creation software, before.

What I would really hope to see is someone more proficient with font creation fixing the "gje" shape, as it looks inceredibly inconsistent and unprofessional when used in printed documents (as of version 4.1 of LibreOffice, we can finaly froce writer to use the proper localised version of the font). The current form would be correct if it was part of a sans serif font, where italics are identical to the regular shapes, but only slanted (and aditionaly "ghe" used the same convention), while, in serif fonts, the italic forms simulate the cursive writing forms.

Comment 3 Pravin Satpute 2013-12-03 05:51:30 UTC
Hi Petar,

  Yes as you said yes the fix was easy.

I did it for "be" Regular and Bold Version. See https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/liberation-fonts.git/commit/?h=liberation-fonts-1_07_3
  


  The second issue you mentioned is "gje" U+0453. If you can provide me correct reference from some other font i can try to improve it as well.

  This fix will be available with next release.

Comment 4 Petar 2013-12-03 14:54:48 UTC
Created attachment 832139 [details]
Book scan showing GJE' (U+0453) and GHE' (U+0433) in italic

A scan showing GJE' (U+0453) and GHE' (U+0433). I'm almost certain that the font used was obtained from some firm that produces professional typefaces - it's printed in Italy. It's hard finding good example from a macedonian book, because GJE' (U+0453) does not appear very often in centences, and where it does, usually the font is normal, instead of italic (as expected).

Comment 5 Petar 2013-12-03 15:05:26 UTC
Created attachment 832140 [details]
Magazine scan showing GJE' (U+0453) and GHE' (U+0433) in italic

This scan shows alternative look for GHE' (U+0433) and GJE' (U+0453) accordingly. GHE' (U+0433) here looks closer to the GHE' (U+0433) used in the bulgarian locale, but still very different from it, and GJE' (U+0453) is consistent with it shape (bulgarians don't have GJE' (U+0453)). But this would requre more extensive change which is probably not necesarry, unless we enter into discussion about which version is stylisticaly closer to the Liberartion Serif style.

Comment 6 Pravin Satpute 2013-12-04 10:37:11 UTC
Thanks for references. Might be i will take some time for it. Will be good if you can open new bugs and provide these references so we can be more concentrate on particular issue.

Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2015-05-29 09:29:26 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '20'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 8 Fedora End Of Life 2015-06-30 01:23:44 UTC
Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 9 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:30:27 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 10 Fedora End Of Life 2017-07-25 18:35:35 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '24'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 11 Fedora End Of Life 2017-08-08 11:43:33 UTC
Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 12 Pravin Satpute 2018-02-22 09:14:15 UTC
Some part of this bug still not resolved. Moving to rawhide, since this fix required in Liberation fonts itself.

Comment 13 Jan Kurik 2018-08-14 11:11:35 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle.
Changing version to '29'.

Comment 14 Ben Cotton 2019-10-31 20:43:16 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '29'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 15 vishalvvr 2019-11-01 02:36:24 UTC
This is still not fixed. Moving to f31

Comment 16 Priyam Gupta 2020-08-25 10:24:36 UTC
As discuss with @vishalvvr few character yet to be fixed , so moving it to fedora 33.

Comment 17 Ben Cotton 2021-11-04 17:34:06 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 33 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 33 on 2021-11-30.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '33'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 33 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 18 Dimitrij Mijoski 2022-04-28 22:16:15 UTC
(In reply to vishalvvr from comment #15)
> This is still not fixed. Moving to f31


I personally fixed few of these issues, please see bug 1574410. More importantly see the github issue https://github.com/liberationfonts/liberation-fonts/issues/10 which has some the most complete info. Not sure if you remember. Only two characters need some more work and those are italic lowercase  "г" and "ѓ".

Comment 19 Ben Cotton 2022-05-12 16:56:06 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 34 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 34 on 2022-06-07.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '34'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 34 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.