Bug 1014511
Summary: | non-fatal devtoolset-2-runtime failure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Developer Toolset | Reporter: | Miroslav Franc <mfranc> |
Component: | devtoolset-meta | Assignee: | Marek Polacek <mpolacek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Cermak <mcermak> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | DTS 2.0 RHEL 6 | CC: | jakub, mfranc, mnewsome, ohudlick |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 2.4 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | devtoolset-2-2.1-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-03-11 06:34:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Miroslav Franc
2013-10-02 09:09:47 UTC
Hopefully just adding '[ -d %{_scl_root} ] &&' will do; it does not make much sense to restore contexts on non-existing files. (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Hopefully just adding '[ -d %{_scl_root} ] &&' will do; it does not make > much sense to restore contexts on non-existing files. Wouldn't adding '[ -d %{_scl_root} ] &&' just change the bad return code from 255 to 1? if-then-fi would be better IMHO. You're right. I meant '[ -d %{_scl_root} ] && ... || :'. I put the (untested) fix in, so hopefully fixed. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0278.html |