Bug 101529
| Summary: | Severn: aspell-pl unavailable. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux Beta | Reporter: | Pawel Salek <pawsa> | ||||
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | beta1 | CC: | gajownik, mgarski, rvokal | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| URL: | http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/pl/ | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2004-09-29 20:31:48 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Pawel Salek
2003-08-02 21:05:09 UTC
switching components so it gets considered URL? Original package is located in the usual place - see updated URL. There is alternative (On March 10, 2004, this dictionary became the official Polish aspell dictionary.) aspell-pl (a lot better then old aspell-pl): http://www.kurnik.pl/dictionary/ It would be nice to add this package to Fedora Core 3. There is a lot of free space on 4th CD :-) Well, I know that developers are rather busy and Fedora is trying to be a community project so I prepared a spec file :) I copied relevant bits from other aspel-XX packages and one line from Marcin Garski spec file. I have to add, that this package was available in RedHat 7.0, but it was removed from 7.1. I presume that it was license issue - in previous version of the dictionary author and copyright terms were unknown. As it was mentioned above, we have now new and much better dictionary, which is licensed under a Creative Commons ShareAlike License. On this site http://www.fsf.org/licenses/licenses.html#OtherWorks they urge "to include a copy of the license with the work, for every work, all the time", so I used %doc macro (the only thing which differs this package from other Fedora aspell-XX packages). Hmm... I have also doubts as to which README file should be included... Well, the choice is up to you :) And the last but not least thing, are these packages really architecture dependent? How about adding BuildArchitectures: noarch to the spec files (I found it in yum.spec)? Created attachment 101767 [details]
Proposal spec file for aspell-pl
Appears to be fixed. |