Bug 1017767
| Summary: | Review Request: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts - Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Calibri font | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Parag Nemade <pnemade> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, lijli, nalimilan, notting, package-review, psatpute |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | petersen:
fedora-review+
petersen: fedora-cvs+ |
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-10-27 05:36:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1018014, 1025628 | ||
|
Description
Parag Nemade
2013-10-10 13:19:43 UTC
Please try to keep the package naming consistent with noto and droid you mean adding the google as a foundry name? yes (unless you have a better name in mind) Thanks. I forgot to add it initially as I was unclear where actually source/ hosting of these fonts on google website (I saw only the tarball archived font files) Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/google-carlito-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/google-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20.src.rpm updated font information page -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Google_Carlito_fonts Alternative possible naming could be google-crosextra-carlito-fonts? It is a little longer of course. I'd suggest rewriting the Summary to the following: Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Calibri font (which is more in the summary style, and "sans-serif" rather than "sanserif"). Updated package to use font name as google-crosextra-carlito Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/google-crosextra-carlito-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20.src.rpm https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Google_Crosextra_Carlito_fonts $ fontaine Carlito-Regular.ttf | grep characterCount
"characterCount":"2116",
$ fontaine calibri.ttf | grep characterCount
"characterCount":"2161",
Looks fine to me, though I didn't have a chance to test it yet.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc21.noarch.rpm
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc21.src.rpm
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-carlito-20130920.tar.gz HTTP Error 405: Method Not Allowed
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint google-crosextra-carlito-fonts
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
config(google-crosextra-carlito-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts:
config(google-crosextra-carlito-fonts)
font(:lang=aa)
font(:lang=ab)
font(:lang=af)
font(:lang=an)
font(:lang=ast)
font(:lang=av)
font(:lang=ay)
font(:lang=az-az)
font(:lang=ba)
font(:lang=be)
font(:lang=ber-dz)
font(:lang=bg)
font(:lang=bi)
font(:lang=bm)
font(:lang=br)
font(:lang=bs)
font(:lang=bua)
font(:lang=ca)
font(:lang=ce)
font(:lang=ch)
font(:lang=chm)
font(:lang=co)
font(:lang=crh)
font(:lang=cs)
font(:lang=csb)
font(:lang=cv)
font(:lang=cy)
font(:lang=da)
font(:lang=de)
font(:lang=el)
font(:lang=en)
font(:lang=eo)
font(:lang=es)
font(:lang=et)
font(:lang=eu)
font(:lang=ff)
font(:lang=fi)
font(:lang=fil)
font(:lang=fj)
font(:lang=fo)
font(:lang=fr)
font(:lang=fur)
font(:lang=fy)
font(:lang=ga)
font(:lang=gd)
font(:lang=gl)
font(:lang=gn)
font(:lang=gv)
font(:lang=ha)
font(:lang=haw)
font(:lang=ho)
font(:lang=hr)
font(:lang=hsb)
font(:lang=ht)
font(:lang=hu)
font(:lang=hz)
font(:lang=ia)
font(:lang=id)
font(:lang=ie)
font(:lang=ig)
font(:lang=ik)
font(:lang=io)
font(:lang=is)
font(:lang=it)
font(:lang=jv)
font(:lang=kaa)
font(:lang=kab)
font(:lang=ki)
font(:lang=kj)
font(:lang=kk)
font(:lang=kl)
font(:lang=kr)
font(:lang=ku-tr)
font(:lang=kum)
font(:lang=kv)
font(:lang=kw)
font(:lang=kwm)
font(:lang=ky)
font(:lang=la)
font(:lang=lb)
font(:lang=lez)
font(:lang=lg)
font(:lang=li)
font(:lang=lt)
font(:lang=lv)
font(:lang=mg)
font(:lang=mh)
font(:lang=mi)
font(:lang=mk)
font(:lang=mn-mn)
font(:lang=mo)
font(:lang=ms)
font(:lang=mt)
font(:lang=na)
font(:lang=nb)
font(:lang=nds)
font(:lang=ng)
font(:lang=nl)
font(:lang=nn)
font(:lang=no)
font(:lang=nr)
font(:lang=nso)
font(:lang=ny)
font(:lang=oc)
font(:lang=om)
font(:lang=os)
font(:lang=pap-an)
font(:lang=pap-aw)
font(:lang=pl)
font(:lang=pt)
font(:lang=qu)
font(:lang=quz)
font(:lang=rm)
font(:lang=rn)
font(:lang=ro)
font(:lang=ru)
font(:lang=rw)
font(:lang=sah)
font(:lang=sc)
font(:lang=sco)
font(:lang=se)
font(:lang=sel)
font(:lang=sg)
font(:lang=sh)
font(:lang=shs)
font(:lang=sk)
font(:lang=sl)
font(:lang=sm)
font(:lang=sma)
font(:lang=smj)
font(:lang=smn)
font(:lang=sms)
font(:lang=sn)
font(:lang=so)
font(:lang=sq)
font(:lang=sr)
font(:lang=ss)
font(:lang=st)
font(:lang=su)
font(:lang=sv)
font(:lang=sw)
font(:lang=tg)
font(:lang=tk)
font(:lang=tl)
font(:lang=tn)
font(:lang=to)
font(:lang=tr)
font(:lang=ts)
font(:lang=tt)
font(:lang=ty)
font(:lang=tyv)
font(:lang=uk)
font(:lang=uz)
font(:lang=ve)
font(:lang=vo)
font(:lang=vot)
font(:lang=wa)
font(:lang=wen)
font(:lang=wo)
font(:lang=xh)
font(:lang=yap)
font(:lang=za)
font(:lang=zu)
font(carlito)
google-crosextra-carlito-fonts
Source checksums
----------------
http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromeos-localmirror/distfiles/crosextrafonts-carlito-20130920.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4bd12b6cbc321c1cf16da76e2c585c925ce956a08067ae6f6c64eff6ccfdaf5a
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4bd12b6cbc321c1cf16da76e2c585c925ce956a08067ae6f6c64eff6ccfdaf5a
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1017767
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG
Package APPROVED
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts Short Description: Sans-serif font metric-compatible with Calibri font Owners: pnemade Branches: f20 f19 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team Git done (by process-git-requests). google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc19 google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts New Branches: f18 Owners: pnemade Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: google-crosextra-carlito-fonts New Branches: el6 Owners: pnemade Git done (by process-git-requests). google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.el6 google-crosextra-carlito-fonts-1.103-0.1.20130920.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. |