Bug 1017824

Summary: [abrt] gnome-shell-3.8.4-5.el7: calendar_sources_init: Process /usr/libexec/gnome-shell-calendar-server was killed by signal 5 (SIGTRAP)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Martin <mholec>
Component: gnome-shellAssignee: Florian Müllner <fmuellner>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: mdomonko, mtoman, tpelka
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 7.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:2255b55fcf7e9d17776d9898b2013aab0e464f08
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-14 15:17:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status none

Description Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:10 UTC
Description of problem:
Testing  Multiple Graphical Login

1.    Install RHEL desktop on multiple virtual or bare metal machines.
2.    Edit the /etc/dconf/profile/user file on every client. If one does not already exist, create it.
3.    Add a line containing service-db:keyfile/user to the file and save your changes.
4.    Setup shared /home directory via NFS on each machine. Put the following line into /etc/fstab
    nest.test.redhat.com:/mnt/qa/scratch/rhel7-gnome-shell-shared-home  /home  nfs  rw  0 0
5.    Create account with username "test" and password "redhat".
6.    Login to Gnome.

Version-Release number of selected component:
gnome-shell-3.8.4-5.el7

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.7
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/libexec/gnome-shell-calendar-server
crash_function: calendar_sources_init
executable:     /usr/libexec/gnome-shell-calendar-server
kernel:         3.10.0-33.el7.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1002
var_log_messages: Oct 10 14:59:59 dhcp131-178 abrt[3338]: Saved core dump of pid 3124 (/usr/libexec/gnome-shell-calendar-server) to /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2013-10-10-14:59:59-3124 (35897344 bytes)

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (9 frames)
 #2 calendar_sources_init at calendar-server/calendar-sources.c:190
 #3 g_type_create_instance at gtype.c:1917
 #4 g_object_constructor at gobject.c:1855
 #7 calendar_sources_get at calendar-server/calendar-sources.c:276
 #8 app_new at calendar-server/gnome-shell-calendar-server.c:773
 #9 on_bus_acquired at calendar-server/gnome-shell-calendar-server.c:989
 #10 connection_get_cb at gdbusnameowning.c:480
 #11 g_simple_async_result_complete at gsimpleasyncresult.c:777
 #12 complete_in_idle_cb at gsimpleasyncresult.c:789

Comment 1 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:14 UTC
Created attachment 810587 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:17 UTC
Created attachment 810589 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:19 UTC
Created attachment 810591 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:23 UTC
Created attachment 810593 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:25 UTC
Created attachment 810595 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:30 UTC
Created attachment 810596 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:38 UTC
Created attachment 810599 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:42 UTC
Created attachment 810600 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Martin 2013-10-10 14:58:44 UTC
Created attachment 810601 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 11 RHEL Program Management 2014-03-22 06:36:29 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 15 Michal Domonkos 2015-05-07 13:41:02 UTC
*** Bug 1049954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***