Bug 1018205
Summary: | quota: change the values of soft-timeout and hard-timeout and there is not "A" message reported | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Saurabh <saujain> |
Component: | glusterfs | Assignee: | Anuradha <atalur> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Sudhir D <sdharane> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2.1 | CC: | asriram, atalur, gluster-bugs, grajaiya, mhideo, mzywusko, smohan, storage-doc, vagarwal, vbellur, vraman |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Known Issue | |
Doc Text: |
Alert message is not reported in the logs when quota soft-timeout and hard-timeout is changed.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-27 06:35:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1020127 |
Description
Saurabh
2013-10-11 12:37:04 UTC
There are two "alert messages" :- A1. one string says "Usage crossed above soft-limit":- comes just the moment default soft-limit is crossed (i.e. 80%) A2. other one is "Usage above soft-limit":- comes on the basis of write to a brick. Now, in this bug I have said there is no "A" message , basically "A" represents alert. Effectively, if the argument is that alert may not have because the write would just surpassed the time that the alert was suppose to come, if this is the case I presume we may miss A1, but what about A2. Patch for review for rhs-2.1 posted on : https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/15345/ Patch for review for rhs-2.1-u1 posted on : https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/15346/ Moving the known issues to Doc team, to be documented in release notes for U1 Moving the known issues to Doc team, to be documented in release notes for U1 Moving the known issues to Doc team, to be documented in release notes for U1 I've documented this as a known issue in the Big Bend Update 1 Release Notes. Here is the link: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/2.1/html/2.1_Update_1_Release_Notes/chap-Documentation-2.1_Update_1_Release_Notes-Known_Issues.html |