Bug 101829

Summary: gimp-print does not build
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Michael Redinger <michael.redinger>
Component: gimp-printAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: twaugh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:58:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 13:44:29 UTC
The Taroon gimp-print-4.2.4-5.src.rpm package does not build correctly
on Taroon (everything install) because there are failed dependencies:

error: Failed build dependencies:
        ghostscript-devel is needed by gimp-print-4.2.4-5
        gimp-devel is needed by gimp-print-4.2.4-5

ghostscript-devel is not included in Taroon (but ghostscript is)
gimp and gimp-devel are not included in Taroon

See also bug #101828

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2003-08-07 13:48:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101828 ***

Comment 2 Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 13:52:59 UTC
Hm, this is not really a duplicate of bug #101828 - note the missing "gimp-devel" 
in this report (as opposed to "gimp-print-devel" 101828).
Reopening it. Feel free to close it again. ;-)


Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2003-08-07 13:55:23 UTC
Oops, sorry.

Comment 4 Michael Redinger 2003-08-07 13:57:53 UTC
Forgot one thing:
I suppose I will find some similar bugs (missing build prereqs).
Should I file them against "distribution" or should I use the appropriate
package (and leave it to the maintainer to reassign the bug if needed)?


Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-08-07 20:04:42 UTC
File them against the package, so we can weed out incorrect/missing
buildprereqs, or incorrectly omitted -devel packages. Once those are verified as
being correct, we can then close the bug appropriately.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101858 ***

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:58:00 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.