Bug 1018511

Summary: Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader - A configuration file reader in golang
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Matthew Miller <mattdm>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jkeck, lacypret, lemenkov, lsm5, mattdm, notting, package-review, vbatts
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-14 21:22:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1018534    

Description Lokesh Mandvekar 2013-10-12 19:14:28 UTC
Spec URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader.spec
SRPM URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader-0-0.1.git8b6c2b5.fc21.src.rpm

Description: A configuration file reader in golang

Fedora Account System Username: lsm5

Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6053834

$ rpmlint SPECS/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader.spec SRPMS/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader-0-0.1.git8b6c2b5.fc21.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader-devel-0-0.1.git8b6c2b5.fc21.noarch.rpm
SPECS/golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader.spec:33: W: setup-not-quiet
golang-github-ccding-go-config-reader.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2013-10-14 18:04:48 UTC
etcd 0.1.2 drops this as a dependency. We can close this one as wontfix if you like.

Comment 2 Lokesh Mandvekar 2013-10-14 18:57:20 UTC
Matt: should we still go ahead with this in case some other package decides to use it?

Comment 3 Matthew Miller 2013-10-14 19:58:32 UTC
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> Matt: should we still go ahead with this in case some other package decides
> to use it?

It's up to you. I'm inclined to skip the work unless there's a good reason, epecially since we may have to update a bunch of these as we update standards. So my recommendation is to close this as WONTFIX -- we can reopen later if need be.