Bug 1018544

Summary: Review Request: libcuefile - A stripped down version of cuetools
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, rc040203, rdieter
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-17 15:21:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1018546    

Description Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-10-13 05:11:04 UTC 
Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libcuefile/libcuefile.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libcuefile/libcuefile-0-0.1.svn475.fc21.src.rpm

Description: 
%{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
used by the musepack tools.

Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha

rpmlint errors:
[asinha@ankur-laptop  SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US musepack -> muse pack, muse-pack, mudpack
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US musepack -> muse pack, muse-pack, mudpack
libcuefile.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcuefile.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
libcuefile.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libcuefile/COPYING
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/toc_parse.h
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/toc_parse.c
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/cue_parse.c
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/cue_parse.h
libcuefile-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 8 warnings.
Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2013-10-13 16:12:23 UTC 
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #0)
> %{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
> used by the musepack tools.

Why can't musepack use libcue? From what I can gather from a brief glance, libcuefile is mostly API compatible to libcue.
Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-10-13 23:41:36 UTC 
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #1)
> (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #0)
> > %{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
> > used by the musepack tools.
> 
> Why can't musepack use libcue? From what I can gather from a brief glance,
> libcuefile is mostly API compatible to libcue.

I've mailed upstream asking them to clarify how libcuefile is different from the library that cuetools provides. I'm not sure yet.
Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2014-07-17 15:21:30 UTC 
Not required any more. musepack builds against libcue now.

Closing