Bug 1019040
Summary: | kate included non-free files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | mejiko <private> |
Component: | kate | Assignee: | Than Ngo <than> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | jreznik, kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, rnovacek, than |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-04-16 12:12:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 |
Description
mejiko
2013-10-15 04:30:20 UTC
Blocking FE-Legal, This is license problem. To avoid having to click around for details...
---------------------------------
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer>
To: Sam Geeraerts <samgee>
Subject: Re: LPC syntax file
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:24:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:56:38PM +0200, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> I see that you are the author of the LPC syntax file
> (kate/syntax/data/lpc.xml) for KDE's editor Kate.
I don't think that even clears the threshold of originality.
Do what ever you want with it.
Regards
Andreas Klauer
---------------------------------
The file kate/syntax/data/lpc.xml says that it's license is "Artistic". It's from 2004, so it's safe to assume that this means the (non-free) Artistic License 1.0.
There are also some syntax files which don't have their license field filled. I asked in #kate on Freenode. Someone called igli replied that it means that they fall under Kate's license (LGPL2), so that should be ok.
---------------------------------
Changed to rawhide. How it this bug current status ? Is this bug is resolved ? Thanks. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 The original author's comment is good enough for me. He argues the contribution isn't copyright'able, and even if it is, "Do what ever you want with it." can mean, relicense it to comply with kde licensing policy. |