Bug 1019102

Summary: Mismash in wording - clustered tx and distributed tx
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Reporter: Ondrej Chaloupka <ochaloup>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: David Michael <dmichael>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Russell Dickenson <rdickens>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.0CC: dmichael, ochaloup, twells
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Build Name: 14874, Administration and Configuration Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 02-10-2013 13:01:57 Topic ID: 4316-495474 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-08-18 08:48:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-10-15 07:33:46 UTC 
Title: JTA Clustering Limitations

Hi,

I would like ask for rephrasing this section. There is some inconsistency in using term clustered txs. What I suppose the user understand in word clustered transaction is possibility of some replication of the transaction state in session. Not such feature is currently available.

This chapter should be named like limitation of JTA in distribution

When you want to get distributed transactions you have to use JTS. But in fact that's not even true now we have JBoss Remoting distributed JTA (check the documentation about jta distributed transaction).

It would be nice when this chapter talks about the misleading terms - I mean clustering and distributed transactions (for some info check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018851).

Thanks
Comment 2 Ondrej Chaloupka 2014-08-18 08:48:47 UTC 
Hi,
yeap, this bz is really obsolete. Closing as no a bug if you don't mind.
Thanks
Ondra