| Summary: | RFE: add bcache support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rolf Fokkens <rolf> |
| Component: | python-blivet | Assignee: | Blivet Maintenance Team <blivet-maint-list> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | amulhern, anaconda-maint-list, bcl, dlehman, myroslav, rtguille |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1003208 | ||
|
Description
Rolf Fokkens
2013-10-15 17:39:09 UTC
rebasing (missed f20 target) dm-cache was not ready for F20: http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2013-August/msg00138.html But dm-cache is now progressing well: http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-January/msg00063.html So if dm-cache is also ready for F21, we should consider: - Are both bcache and dm-cache to be supported in Anaconda/python-blivet? - If not, which one is the best choice? Given the fact that serious changes on bcache are planned, I think this change should be postponed until further notice: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg02721.html |