Bug 1019992
Summary: | Subscription-manager removes RHUI client certificates under /etc/pki/entitlement during "subscription-manager clean" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | dgao |
Component: | subscription-manager | Assignee: | candlepin-bugs |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | John Sefler <jsefler> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | alikins, bkearney, dgao, dgoodwin, ipanova, tsanders, vkuznets |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1011082 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2013-10-21 14:52:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 863175 |
Description
dgao
2013-10-16 18:13:32 UTC
RHUI is now placing their certs in their own location. I am extremely hesitant to fix this, ideally yes it would be nice if the directory was named to be rhsm specific, but /etc/pki is probably the correct location for the certificates. There is no concept of "known" certificates, we support disconnected scenarios where certificates can be manually imported. Trying to track which ones we put there, where they came from, and whether or not someone dropped one in place by themselves is a big increase in complexity and risk for bugs. /etc/pki/entitlement has been subscription-manager certs since day one, nothing else can/should write there. Changing this at this point is going to introduce more problems, and there is almost nothing gained by doing so as far as I can tell. I am going to close as a WONTFIX, if anyone feels strongly that this must be done and there is a tangible benefit to doing so then please reopen and state the case but I really do not want to take the upgrade risk and increase in complexity if we don't need to. |