Bug 102054
Summary: | glibc-2.3.2 src rpm does not include bzip2 in it's BuildPreReq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | alex kramarov <alex-redbug> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-08-20 19:47:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
alex kramarov
2003-08-09 22:29:12 UTC
If anything, it should be rpm-build which would Requires: bzip2. There are lots of packages with bzip2'ed tarballs, and what makes it different from gzip? Alternatively, bzip2 can be considered a part of the base package set which should be always installed in order to build packages. Stuff like filesystem, coreutils, glibc, gcc, autoconf, libgcc, awk, find, perl, patch, ... I have no idea why this is deemed an rpm bug. |