Bug 102065
| Summary: | Spec file missing some BuildRequires | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Dams <anvil> |
| Component: | nautilus | Assignee: | Alexander Larsson <alexl> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 1.0 | CC: | anvil, srevivo |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-10-08 09:42:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
> Installing libjpeg-devel fixed that small problem.
==> "BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel" should be added to spec file.
It doen't acutally use libjpeg anymore, thats a leftover check. I removed it upstream. I'm not sure if we need to build-req gettext. Doesn't something else drag that in already? warren? gettext should be listed as BuildRequires, and sometimes gettext-devel if it is necessary. gettext buildreq added to cvs. Will be in next package build. |
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.7 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20030131 Description of problem: from nautilus configure : checking for jpeg_start_decompress in -ljpeg... no configure: WARNING: *** (jpeg library not found) *** configure: WARNING: *** JPEG loader will not be built (jpeg header file not found) *** Installing libjpeg-devel fixed that small problem. Later in rebuild : No translations found for nautilus in /var/tmp/nautilus-2.2.4-root erreur: Mauvais status de sortie pour /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20861 (%install) --> "BuildRequires: gettext" should be added to spec file. [BTW, I saw nautilus configure looking for medusa... just wondering : is medusa or nautilus with medusa broken or something ? Why not add medusa support ?] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nautilus-2.2.4-5.src.rpm How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpmbuild --rebuild nautilus-2.2.4-5.src.rpm Additional info: