Bug 1021185
Summary: | openstack-nova: nvoa fail to attach volumes to instances | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Yogev Rabl <yrabl> | ||||
Component: | openstack-nova | Assignee: | Xavier Queralt <xqueralt> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Ami Jeain <ajeain> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | dallan, hateya, ndipanov, yeylon, yrabl | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | 4.0 | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | storage | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-15 15:02:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Yogev Rabl
2013-10-20 08:30:47 UTC
Created attachment 814163 [details]
logs of the nova and cinder while trying to attach a volume to an instance
after rebooting the machine the volume-attach worked. I haven't been able to reproduce this issue with the latest puddle (which contains the final version of nova instead of the RC1). Could you try again with it? Besides this, I'm missing some information in the description: * How was the volume created? I see that nova selects /dev/hda as device name which should only be valid for the ide bus (e.g. cdrom) when using the kvm or qemu hypervisors. If you haven't created the volume from a cdrom type image, an empty volume should use the virtio bus and the device name should look like /dev/vd? * I see an error in the compute logs claiming that /dev/hda is already in use. Did you specify this device name when calling attach-volume or you specified auto? Could you provide the full command list you run? * Is cinder using swift as its storage backend? I see a partial traceback in the beginning of the attached logs but it looks old. * I'd suggest to attach the logs for each service in a different file instead of attaching the output of tail on all the logs, otherwise it might get a bit confusing. With the information provided, it's not possible to do anything further with this BZ, so I'm closing as INSUFFICIENT DATA. If the information becomes available, please don't hesitate to reopen and provide it. The problem never reproduced |