Bug 1021693

Summary: > and < are not showing up correctly in code examples
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 6 Reporter: Brian Ashburn <bashburn>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Jared MORGAN <jmorgan>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Dominik Pospisil <dpospisi>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1.0CC: aasingh, epp-bugs, jmorgan, jpallich, jpp-docs, mmurray
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: 6.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Build Name: 16459, Administration and Configuration Guide-6.1-6.1.0 Build Date: 14-10-2013 10:51:24 Topic ID: 16696-452673 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-05-02 04:29:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot of the area none

Description Brian Ashburn 2013-10-21 19:57:31 UTC
Created attachment 814785 [details]
Screenshot of the area

Title: Configuring Classic Portal

Describe the issue:
XML code shows as &gt; and &lt; instead of < and > which makes it very hard to read the code.

Suggestions for improvement:


Additional information:

Comment 2 Jared MORGAN 2013-10-21 21:31:38 UTC
Thanks for the bug report on this, Brian.

These XML entities should not be showing up in published builds. I'll check the XML to see what's going on here. I have a feeling this code block has been enclosed in a <![CDATA[]]> block and the entities are not resolving because of this structure.

Either way, we will be doing an Async push of docs for 6.1 and we will definitely add this bug to the list.

Comment 3 Brian Ashburn 2013-10-21 21:33:03 UTC
Thanks. You might want to do a scan through more of those pages from that doc, I saw it in a few other places. I can scan through it and add links if you need.

-BA

Comment 4 Jared MORGAN 2013-10-21 21:48:22 UTC
(In reply to Brian Ashburn from comment #3)
> Thanks. You might want to do a scan through more of those pages from that
> doc, I saw it in a few other places. I can scan through it and add links if
> you need.
> 
> -BA

We'll check it out, Brian. Thanks for the tip-off.

Comment 5 Jared MORGAN 2013-10-21 21:52:30 UTC
156 instances of &lt;

It should be pretty straightforward to go through the guide and clean these up. I have a suspicion that this is the result of the bulk import we did for this guide to get it into our CCMS system.

Comment 6 Aakanksha 2014-04-07 11:23:35 UTC
Hi Jared, 

I remember you working on the bug for 6.1 release. 
Can we mark this bug for closure?

Comment 7 Jared MORGAN 2014-04-08 03:11:34 UTC
(In reply to Aakanksha from comment #6)
> Hi Jared, 
> 
> I remember you working on the bug for 6.1 release. 
> Can we mark this bug for closure?

Yep, this should be good to close-off. I've set it to modified.

http://docbuilder.usersys.redhat.com/22542/remarks/ should no longer have any instance of &lt; and &gt; specified.

Comment 8 Jared MORGAN 2014-05-02 04:29:51 UTC
Just verified this myself. No &lt; or &gt; elements present.