Bug 1023369

Summary: Rebase of gssproxy to latest 0.3.0 release
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Guenther Deschner <gdeschner>
Component: gssproxyAssignee: Guenther Deschner <gdeschner>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: JianHong Yin <jiyin>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: dpal, jiyin, jpazdziora, kzhang, ssorce, svenkatr
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 10:05:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 854411    

Description Guenther Deschner 2013-10-25 09:47:36 UTC
In order to continue supporting nfs integration with gssproxy for the upcoming rpc.gssd changes, we need to rebase gssproxy to the latest version.

Comment 3 JianHong Yin 2013-11-15 06:00:36 UTC
# vershow gssproxy-  g/rhel-?7.*201311
=> rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1 -> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1/compose/Server/x86_64/os/Packages}
gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

=> rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1 -> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1/compose/Server/x86_64/os/Packages}
gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

Comment 4 Jan Pazdziora 2014-01-02 08:42:45 UTC
(In reply to Yin.JianHong from comment #3)
> # vershow gssproxy-  g/rhel-?7.*201311
> => rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1 ->
> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1/compose/Server/
> x86_64/os/Packages}
> gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
> 
> => rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1 ->
> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1/compose/Server/
> x86_64/os/Packages}
> gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hello, what does the Flags: qe_test_coverage? → qe_test_coverage- mean? What sort of automated tests did we run on GSS-Proxy?

It seems the rebase caused regression bug 1047776. Do we have tests for that kind of setup / will we have? Is that regression a reason to revert that rebase?

Comment 8 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 10:05:40 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.