| Summary: | Dist-geo-rep : geo-rep went to faulty with traceback OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '.gfid/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Vijaykumar Koppad <vkoppad> |
| Component: | geo-replication | Assignee: | Amar Tumballi <amarts> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vijaykumar Koppad <vkoppad> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 2.1 | CC: | aavati, amarts, bbandari, csaba, grajaiya, nsathyan, vraman |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.4.0.42rhs-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-11-27 15:44:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Vijaykumar Koppad
2013-10-25 10:16:23 UTC
I was able to reproduce them even while creating hardlinks. The particular changelogs have NULL GFID, like E 69be80b8-6037-44fd-9ba1-0523e896b7f6 LINK 11794ef1-7632-42ba-ac28-42ab9406042f%2F526a4de8%25%257WUVHEDYJH M 69be80b8-6037-44fd-9ba1-0523e896b7f6 M 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 M 61bd5f6c-9d62-4262-98d7-723a4647f8bb M 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 M 94df0a4a-17eb-4d37-ac58-dbefb8ec9b05 Earlier, the quota was enabled. Even with quota disables it is reproducible. can you confirm with .38rhs? because two fixes which went into solve some setxattr() inode being NULL here.. Also looks like bug 1025476 is related. Tried couple of times on the build glusterfs-3.4.0.43rhs-1. Seems to work fine. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1769.html |