Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionAlexander Todorov
2013-10-30 14:46:05 UTC
Description of problem:
The are librtas.so.$version librtasevent.so.$version and libofdt.so.$version ELF files available in the source rpm, inside the tar.gz archive.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
librtas-1.3.8-2.el7.src.rpm
I won't pack a new tarball, but make sure that the files get deleted and then rebuilt (if necessary)
Comment 4Alexander Todorov
2014-03-19 14:21:29 UTC
(In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #2)
> I won't pack a new tarball, but make sure that the files get deleted and
> then rebuilt (if necessary)
You have forgotten to remove librtasevent_src/librtasevent.so.1.3.6
Btw why not find -name "*.so.*" -delete ?
I'm still waiting for an appropriate system where I can rebuild the binary package and inspect the contents. Not sure if librtasevent.so gets rebuild.
Sorry, I've skipped librtasevent.so.1.3.6. Would you like me to respin the package ?
librtasevent.so.1.3.6 gets rebuilt, but better save than sorry:
> CC librtasevent_src/get_rtas_event.o
> CC librtasevent_src/print_rtas_event.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_cpu.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_dump.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_epow.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_io.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_lri.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_mem.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_post.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_sp.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_srcfru.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_v6_misc.o
> CC librtasevent_src/rtas_vend.o
> LD librtasevent_src/librtasevent.so.1.3.8...
Comment 6Alexander Todorov
2014-03-19 15:07:24 UTC
After rebuilding the current package librtas.so.1.3.6, librtas.so.1.3.7 and libofdt.so.1.3.6 are all removed and replaced by their 1.3.8 counterparts.
While librtasevent.so.1.3.6 is not removed and we end up with two versions in the BUILD/ dir:
librtasevent.so.1.3.6
librtasevent.so.1.3.8
*Only* librtasevent.so.1.3.8 is packaged in the binary RPM which is what is expected.
Comment 8Alexander Todorov
2014-03-20 08:48:43 UTC
(In reply to Alexander Todorov from comment #6)
> While librtasevent.so.1.3.6 is not removed ...
With librtas-1.3.8-6.el7 all .so files are removed and then rebuilt.
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.
Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.