Bug 1024934
| Summary: | 1PC can cause a window of inconsistency with L1 invalidation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Data Grid 6 | Reporter: | Martin Gencur <mgencur> |
| Component: | unspecified | Assignee: | Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant> |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Martin Gencur <mgencur> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | jdg-bugs |
| Target Milestone: | ER4 | ||
| Target Release: | 6.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-02-10 03:28:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1017190 | ||
|
Description
Martin Gencur
2013-10-30 15:28:32 UTC
William Burns <wburns> updated the status of jira ISPN-3518 to Coding In Progress Radim Vansa <rvansa> made a comment on jira ISPN-3518 I know it's already fixed, but is it really a bug? The described scenario does not break the serializability property of the transactions - the outcome is the same as if tx2 was executed before tx1. Could you describe the scenario where it does break some expected property? This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla. |