Bug 1025911
Summary: | LVMError: lvresize failed for home: running lvm lvresize --force -L 2000000m fedora/home failed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Murphy <bugzilla> | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Version: | 20 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, bugzilla, g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, kparal, robatino, vanmeeuwen+fedora | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:87dc9bcbcf582be09c08ea01f82d42618b0c8a1cc176178816241d61e8ccc852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-06 14:39:37 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 980656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Chris Murphy
2013-11-01 23:11:41 UTC
Created attachment 818492 [details]
File: anaconda-tb
Created attachment 818493 [details]
File: anaconda.log
Created attachment 818494 [details]
File: environ
Created attachment 818495 [details]
File: journalctl
Created attachment 818496 [details]
File: lsblk_output
Created attachment 818497 [details]
File: nmcli_dev_list
Created attachment 818498 [details]
File: os_info
Created attachment 818499 [details]
File: program.log
Created attachment 818500 [details]
File: storage.log
Created attachment 818501 [details]
File: ifcfg.log
Proposed as a Blocker for 20-final by Fedora user chrismurphy using the blocker tracking app because: Not proposed as a beta blocker because the failure occurs in the course of lvresize and we don't have a resize criteria for beta. "Any installer mechanism for resizing storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation." I configured disk in manual partitioning. I tried to reuse previous Fedora installation, I just deleted /home and enlarged /. Reused swap and /boot. No rocket science. cmdline: /usr/bin/python /sbin/anaconda cmdline_file: inst.stage2=http://download.eng.brq.redhat.com/pub/fedora/fedora-alt/stage/20-Beta-RC4/Fedora/i386/os/ inst.repo=http://download.eng.brq.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/20/i386/os/ initrd=F20/Beta-RC4/i386/initrd.img BOOT_IMAGE=F20/Beta-RC4/i386/vmlinuz hashmarkername: anaconda kernel: 3.11.6-301.fc20.i686 package: anaconda-20.25.6-1 product: Fedora reason: LVMError: lvresize failed for root: running lvm lvresize --force -L 49556m fedora_dhcp-29-193/root failed release: Cannot get release name. version: 20-Beta (In reply to Kamil Páral from comment #12) > I configured disk in manual partitioning. I tried to reuse previous Fedora > installation, I just deleted /home and enlarged /. Reused swap and /boot. No > rocket science. Please attach your logs. If you have an anaconda-tb-* file that is all you need to attach. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1026466 *** (In reply to David Lehman from comment #13) > Please attach your logs. If you have an anaconda-tb-* file that is all you > need to attach. Sorry, ABRT does not do that automatically when putting me to CC, and I assumed the logs were already sufficient from the initial reporter. Since you already closed this as a duplicate, I guess you no longer need them? |