Bug 1026037

Summary: [abrt] tracker-0.16.2-4.fc20: strncmp: Process /usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mikhail <mikhail.v.gavrilov>
Component: trackerAssignee: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: aguzmansimon, avv.marengoni, brian, dakingun, debarshir, leigh123linux, oliverpabst.gm, q2dg, serega.belarus, udara.u3
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/e7878a36029e03c1d3b78ade8903d1a93e25de45
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:91d114bd905a2d84b22862c2ae545ed0dbe6a93e
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-10 16:43:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: exploitable
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status none

Description Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:31 UTC 
Version-Release number of selected component:
tracker-0.16.2-4.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.9
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs
crash_function: strncmp
executable:     /usr/libexec/tracker-miner-fs
kernel:         3.11.6-301.fc20.x86_64+debug
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (9 frames)
 #0 strncmp at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strcmp.S:209
 #1 file_node_data_equal_or_child at tracker-file-system.c:186
 #2 file_tree_lookup at tracker-file-system.c:263
 #3 tracker_file_system_set_property at tracker-file-system.c:724
 #4 crawler_finished_cb at tracker-file-notifier.c:647
 #5 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEANv at gmarshal.c:188
 #6 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840
 #9 tracker_crawler_stop at tracker-crawler.c:914
 #10 process_func at tracker-crawler.c:548

Potential duplicate: bug 812217
Comment 1 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:39 UTC 
Created attachment 818641 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:43 UTC 
Created attachment 818642 [details]
File: cgroup
Comment 3 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:47 UTC 
Created attachment 818643 [details]
File: core_backtrace
Comment 4 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:50 UTC 
Created attachment 818644 [details]
File: dso_list
Comment 5 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:53 UTC 
Created attachment 818645 [details]
File: environ
Comment 6 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:03:56 UTC 
Created attachment 818646 [details]
File: exploitable
Comment 7 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:04:00 UTC 
Created attachment 818647 [details]
File: limits
Comment 8 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:04:04 UTC 
Created attachment 818648 [details]
File: maps
Comment 9 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:04:07 UTC 
Created attachment 818649 [details]
File: open_fds
Comment 10 Mikhail 2013-11-02 22:04:10 UTC 
Created attachment 818650 [details]
File: proc_pid_status
Comment 11 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-07-26 17:12:35 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 12 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-07-27 06:34:34 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 13 Debarshi Ray 2014-10-10 16:43:36 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 ***
Comment 14 Brian J. Murrell 2014-11-02 14:12:23 UTC 
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #13)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 ***

It's really quite annoying when public bugs -- the ones that abrt is going to find and direct one to -- are closed as a duplicate of a private bug.  How are those of us afflicted with this bug supposed to contribute to and follow the process of private bugs that are affecting us every day?
Comment 15 Debarshi Ray 2014-11-02 15:04:40 UTC 
(In reply to Brian J. Murrell from comment #14)
> (In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #13)
> > 
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1018368 ***
> 
> It's really quite annoying when public bugs -- the ones that abrt is going
> to find and direct one to -- are closed as a duplicate of a private bug.

It should be OK now.

> How are those of us afflicted with this bug supposed to contribute to and
> follow the process of private bugs that are affecting us every day?

Would have been happier if you had not assumed malice so easily.
Comment 16 Brian J. Murrell 2014-11-02 15:16:36 UTC 
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #15)
> 
> It should be OK now.

Ahh.  Thanks!

> Would have been happier if you had not assumed malice so easily.

I wasn't assuming malice, but just expressing my frustration as this happens more frequently than just occasionally.  But you are right.  I will try to keep my frustration to myself in the future.