Bug 1026232

Summary: licq-1.8.1 released
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene>
Component: licqAssignee: Christopher Meng <i>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: contribs, i, ktdreyer, yaneti
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-07 03:39:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eugene A. Pivnev 2013-11-04 09:04:50 UTC
It's time to "Version bump.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6135006

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2013-11-04 09:10:24 UTC
Oh, I forgot to add it to upstream releases tracking list...

Will be done soon.

Comment 2 Eugene A. Pivnev 2013-11-04 09:12:02 UTC
Dont forgot this patch:
https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a

Comment 3 Christopher Meng 2013-11-04 09:13:19 UTC
(In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #2)
> Dont forgot this patch:
> https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/
> 65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a

Is it important? I can't find any explanation......

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2013-11-04 09:14:51 UTC
Ok, I saw something in the patch:

https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a.patch

I will try later.

Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2013-11-04 09:21:11 UTC
BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-11-04 10:44:51 UTC
licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/licq-1.8.1-1.fc19

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-11-04 11:23:31 UTC
licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/licq-1.8.1-1.fc20

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-11-04 17:51:13 UTC
Package licq-1.8.1-1.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing licq-1.8.1-1.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20586/licq-1.8.1-1.fc20
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 9 Eugene A. Pivnev 2013-11-04 18:06:34 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome.

Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare:
1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png
2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png
(Note "Add myself" button)

Another proposition (I don't like to make new ticket) - to split licq into some packages. They say, that licq plugins are independent now.
Like this:
* licq-core (Requires: licq-plugin)
* licq-plugin-jabber (Provides: licq-plugin)
* licq-plugin-icq (Provides: licq-plugin)
* licq-plugin-msn (Provides: licq-plugin)
* licq (meta-pkg - Requires: licq-*)

Comment 10 Ken Dreyer 2013-11-04 18:16:41 UTC
(In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #9)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> > BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome.
> 
> Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means
> "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare:
> 1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png
> 2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png
> (Note "Add myself" button)

There are several packages in Fedora with many more maintainers than licq. I think the reason "Add myself" is missing in the first image is because you'll need to click the "CSRF PROTECTED - VERIFY LOGIN" button at the top of the web page.

Comment 11 Eugene A. Pivnev 2013-11-04 20:17:54 UTC
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #10)
> (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> > > BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome.
> > 
> > Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means
> > "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare:
> > 1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png
> > 2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png
> > (Note "Add myself" button)
> 
> There are several packages in Fedora with many more maintainers than licq. I
> think the reason "Add myself" is missing in the first image is because
> you'll need to click the "CSRF PROTECTED - VERIFY LOGIN" button at the top
> of the web page.

You are right, thank you.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-11-05 02:55:44 UTC
Package licq-1.8.1-1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing licq-1.8.1-1.fc19'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20646/licq-1.8.1-1.fc19
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2013-11-07 03:39:05 UTC
licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2013-11-13 02:01:32 UTC
licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.