Bug 1026232
Summary: | licq-1.8.1 released | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene> |
Component: | licq | Assignee: | Christopher Meng <i> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 19 | CC: | contribs, i, ktdreyer, yaneti |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-07 03:39:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Eugene A. Pivnev
2013-11-04 09:04:50 UTC
Oh, I forgot to add it to upstream releases tracking list... Will be done soon. Dont forgot this patch: https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #2) > Dont forgot this patch: > https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/ > 65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a Is it important? I can't find any explanation...... Ok, I saw something in the patch: https://github.com/licq-im/licq/commit/65026d68241c4c91e6ee8b063b5499cdbe7da14a.patch I will try later. BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome. licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 Package licq-1.8.1-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing licq-1.8.1-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20586/licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome. Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare: 1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png 2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png (Note "Add myself" button) Another proposition (I don't like to make new ticket) - to split licq into some packages. They say, that licq plugins are independent now. Like this: * licq-core (Requires: licq-plugin) * licq-plugin-jabber (Provides: licq-plugin) * licq-plugin-icq (Provides: licq-plugin) * licq-plugin-msn (Provides: licq-plugin) * licq (meta-pkg - Requires: licq-*) (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #9) > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > > BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome. > > Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means > "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare: > 1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png > 2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png > (Note "Add myself" button) There are several packages in Fedora with many more maintainers than licq. I think the reason "Add myself" is missing in the first image is because you'll need to click the "CSRF PROTECTED - VERIFY LOGIN" button at the top of the web page. (In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #10) > (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #9) > > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > > > BTW if you want to comaintain it, welcome. > > > > Seems that Fedora's rule "good idea to have _least_ 3 pkg maintainers" means > > "you can't have more then 3 maintainers". Let's compare: > > 1. http://i.imgur.com/weaNNLs.png > > 2. http://i.imgur.com/R0Y8AMf.png > > (Note "Add myself" button) > > There are several packages in Fedora with many more maintainers than licq. I > think the reason "Add myself" is missing in the first image is because > you'll need to click the "CSRF PROTECTED - VERIFY LOGIN" button at the top > of the web page. You are right, thank you. Package licq-1.8.1-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing licq-1.8.1-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20646/licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). licq-1.8.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. licq-1.8.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |